![]() Klarman's From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality is at once a legal and social history of the years before and after the historic 1954 decision in Brown v. Legal historians are, of necessity, social historians. Klarman, From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Search for Equality (Oxford Univ. An appendix presents significant state Supreme Court rulings that have struck down or upheld the existing school finance system.Michael J. Winston) notes the presidency's limits in addressing the problem. ![]() "Educational Equity and the President's Initiative on Race" (Judith A. "Electoral Politics and School Finance Reform" (Jeffrey Henig) examines the state electoral considerations that affect educational equity. Reed) discusses the trajectory from school desegregation lawsuits to school finance lawsuits, suggesting that school finance suits generally make a difference. "State Courts and Educational Finance" (Douglas S. Reed) maintains that the levels of racial oppression and racial conflict were altered by the decision, though it did not create a more equal educational system. Board" (Roger Wilkins) suggests that the case changed the expectations of black Americans in ways that ultimately had profound consequences for the nation. ![]() Patterson) highlights the impact of the case on the civil rights movement and school integration or desegregation and educational quality, asserting ambivalence about the role of Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy" (James T. These papers are based on a 2002 seminar that examined the book "Brown v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |